What the US–China trade dispute is all about

Market Comment, May 2018 

What the US–China trade dispute is all about

In late phases of the global economic cycle, production capacity is generally heavily utilized, which is why more resources are required – such as labour, but also commodities. Historically, this has often led to higher rates of inflation due to higher commodity prices. Higher import prices against a backdrop of the escalating trade conflict and US sanctions against Iran could have the effect of exacerbating increases in commodity price inflation. Investors can counter rising inflation and commodity prices with a commodities focus module.

Various indicators suggest that we are currently in a late – but not yet final – phase of the global economic cycle. These indicators include the development of yield curves, optimistic business surveys, and the very positive state of consumer sentiment in both the US and Europe. In phases like this, production capacity tends to be so heavily utilized that greater resources are required to satisfy increasing demand – in the form of both labour and commodities.

This is particularly the case when rising demand comes up against rather restricted supply, as is currently the case in both the US and German labour markets which are currently recording record low unemployment levels and with respect to certain commodities such as oil.

History shows that this leads to a rise in inflation via an increase in the prices of both commodities and labour, initially for producers, but then also for consumers and investors. It is possible that this phenomenon will be less pronounced this time around due to globalization and increased competition, but burgeoning protectionism and trade conflict are now undermining the globalization trend.

It is only reasonable to assume that a proportion of the price increases that result for companies, particularly rising energy prices and wage growth in the US, will now increasingly lead to higher inflation at the consumer price level. Over the next few months in particular, so-called base effects (lower basis of prior year for various components of inflation) should trigger a clear rise in inflation.

In addition, the new punitive tariffs imposed by the US should provide additional inflationary stimulus. If globalization is less able to exert its effect due to protectionism, inflation via more expensive imports could prove even higher, depending on how the tariff circle spirals over the next few months. Higher tariffs from China and the European Union as a response to the US special tariffs could then trigger an even greater rise in inflation.

The question for investors in this context is how the rise in inflation can be countered where investments are concerned. Historically speaking, commodities – rather like bonds – are liable to benefit from higher inflation, whereas equities are more dependent on earnings growth. Between 1976 and 2017 in quears of increasing U.S. interest rates commodities returned 14% p.a. on average, equities +11% and bonds +4%.

On the one hand, commodities are inflationary drivers in their own right – as we are currently seeing with energy prices, whose development is being driven above all by supply bottlenecks arising from the US sanctions against Iran – while, on the other, commodities are typically likely to end up at even higher levels in the medium term, as is typical of the late phase of the global economic cycle (as described above).

The CMCI Commodity Price Index has now broken its downward trend. The graphs below show the correlation between inflation in the US and Europe on the one hand and commodity prices on the other. re indirectly also the eurozone and the euro – come with additional risks attached, which is why we prefer other regions.

US-Inflation (% change year-on-year) and Commodity Price Index

juli18_gr1

Eurozone Inflation (% change year-on-year) and Commodity Price Index

juli18_gr2

 

Gérard Piasko

Gérard Piasko

Gérard Piasko is CIO and head of the investment committee of private bank Maerki Baumann & Co. AG. Before he was for many years CIO of Julius Baer, Sal. Oppenheim and Deutsche Bank.

Modular investments with Maerki Baumann

The highlighted focus modules allow you to represent the mentioned topics in your portfolio:

Aktien Schweiz Aktien USA
Nebenwerte Schweiz Aktien Schwellenländer
Aktien Eurozone Aktien Global
Aktien Deutschland  
Obligationen CHF Global Ausgewogen
Obligationen EUR Rohstoffe
Obligationen USD  
Obligationen Schwellenländer  

Please contact your client advisor for further information.

Important legal information:

This publication is not intended to bring about the conclusion of a contract, but solely provides market and investment commentary by Maerki Baumann & Co. AG and an assessment of selected financial instruments. Hence, this publication does not constitute investment advice or an offer to buy or sell investment instruments. Maerki Baumann & Co. AG does not provide legal or tax advice. Maerki Baumann & Co. AG accepts no liability whatsoever for the contents of this publication. In particular, it does not accept any liability for losses or damage of any kind, whether direct, indirect or incidental, incurred as a result of using the information contained in this publication and/or arising from the risks inherent in the financial markets.

Editorial deadline: 12 July 2018

Maerki Baumann & Co. AG
Dreikönigstrasse 6, CH-8002 Zurich
T +41 44 286 25 25, info@maerki-baumann.ch
www.maerki-baumann.ch

top